Re: 1.5 tutorials, good starting point?
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 2:36 am
While writing about JObject I wasn´t aware of the discussion in this thread...
It reflects perfectly my concerns!
I think I am more or less offering the so-called "munchies"... and also agree that its content may be a bit "chaotic" (is it?)... but I am also waiting or wishing for the so-called "larger scheme"... in fact, I started JObject thread because the whole 101 forum was a "metaforum" only discussing about itself, and I decided to start with something, anything... (with some intuition but absolutely no scheme, I confess...)
When I started writing, I assumed knowledge about PHP and OOP concepts, but as long the replies came, there was a changing in the direction, so now it seems an OOP class using JObject as sample. It may be interesting, because people learn OOP and JObject at the same time and subtly are being educated to code in J! style. But that was not the intention when opening the thread, it is a reflection of the feedback.
Now, I put some links of references to the OOP concepts needed for the understanding of the posts on themselves. The "linking" nature of the web is helping me to keep the thread focus on Joomla's JObject, but as you can see in "toString" method discussion, it should be one paragraph long with the assumption mentioned previously, but became an OOP lesson...
Also, I am now concerned about the humor. I´m afraid some little jokes can confuse the readers... It is entertaining to me to write with some humoristic style but I am starting to question myself if it is appropriated for something which can become a documentation.
Finally, I will change username from "uberlandia" to "jbruni" (I created uberlandia because I lost jbruni´s password and didn´t find how to recover - asked about it in 101 chat in Skype and Ian kindly helped me on that. Thanks!)
It reflects perfectly my concerns!
I think I am more or less offering the so-called "munchies"... and also agree that its content may be a bit "chaotic" (is it?)... but I am also waiting or wishing for the so-called "larger scheme"... in fact, I started JObject thread because the whole 101 forum was a "metaforum" only discussing about itself, and I decided to start with something, anything... (with some intuition but absolutely no scheme, I confess...)
When I started writing, I assumed knowledge about PHP and OOP concepts, but as long the replies came, there was a changing in the direction, so now it seems an OOP class using JObject as sample. It may be interesting, because people learn OOP and JObject at the same time and subtly are being educated to code in J! style. But that was not the intention when opening the thread, it is a reflection of the feedback.
Now, I put some links of references to the OOP concepts needed for the understanding of the posts on themselves. The "linking" nature of the web is helping me to keep the thread focus on Joomla's JObject, but as you can see in "toString" method discussion, it should be one paragraph long with the assumption mentioned previously, but became an OOP lesson...
Also, I am now concerned about the humor. I´m afraid some little jokes can confuse the readers... It is entertaining to me to write with some humoristic style but I am starting to question myself if it is appropriated for something which can become a documentation.
Finally, I will change username from "uberlandia" to "jbruni" (I created uberlandia because I lost jbruni´s password and didn´t find how to recover - asked about it in 101 chat in Skype and Ian kindly helped me on that. Thanks!)