The Joomla! Forum™

Right now, the forum choices are 1.0.x and 1.5.x which includes all the Beta and RC posts cluttering things up and confusing matters. I would suggest moving all the Beta and RC 1.5 stuff to a separate area, since much of it is outdated. I would suggest that the 1.5 forums be a clean slate with infor...

The idea is to support 1.0.x for a year after 1.5 has been released. Very good to hear. Given my internal estimates (guesses?) about when Joomla 1.5 will hit, that lines up with my 18-24 months. I would hope that if a security vulnerability is found in the 1.0.xx series and an easy fix is possible,...

That's ok and maybe you could also suggest something about security matters or that the 1.5 has a future... 1.0.x versions are at their last days... better support... and much more... I am going to have a serious beef with Joomla if either of the following things stop in the next 18-24 months: - 1....

The strange thing is, the e-mail link I get for THIS topic is fine. As well as some other e-mail notifications. It is only this topic and a few topics in the past:

http://forum.joomla.org/index.php/topic ... icseen=new

Maybe it is because the initial poster has a _ in their name?

If it were % instead of = then it would be converting properly:

%3F with ?
%3D with =
%23 with #

But =3F, =3D, and =23 is meaningless in any urldecode/urlencode situation.

When an e-mail notification goes out about a new reply to a topic, the link is mangled like this:

View the reply at: http://forum.joomla.org/index.php=3Ftop ... seen=23new

The correct link is:

http://forum.joomla.org/index.php/topic ... 6.html#new

I am using Eudora. Please fix!!

Screen shots of Joomla 1.5 can be seen in the Joomla 1.5 Blog.

Is there a discussion by devs and core devs about how node-based content heirarchy is going to be done? I would find such a discussion fascinating to say the least. I'm sure there will be an importer that does its absolute best to preserve everything. Itemids shouldn't have to change, should they? O...

The FAQ at OpenSourceMatters is now quite a bit out of date. 

http://www.opensourcematters.org/index. ... aq&catid=6