joomla.org does not validate!!!

If you have any 'mechanical' forum or Joomla! sites related issues/suggestions, please contact the Sites & Infrastructure Workgroup here.

Moderators: brad, Tonie

Forum rules
Forum Rules
READ ME <-- please read before posting, this means YOU.
Post Reply
calorifer
Joomla! Apprentice
Joomla! Apprentice
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:19 am
Location: 127.0.0.1
Contact:

joomla.org does not validate!!!

Post by calorifer » Sat Sep 10, 2005 7:02 am

my signature is undergoin rebranding, stay put and wait for it

vavroom

Re: joomla.org does not validate!!!

Post by vavroom » Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:14 am

Thanks for your feedback. We *are* aware we don't validate.  And we *are* working on it.  That's one of the reason I was brought on board last week :)

The aim is to be WCAG Priority 2 compliant by version 1.2.  xHTML (transitional) and CSS compliance are also in the book in the not too distant future.

There is a fair bit to fix in the code, and right now the priority is to get a first release of Joomla! going.

But we've established a plan of attack :)  Hopefully it won't be too long before we have an engine that generates properly marked up and organised, semantically correct content.  Once that happens, we're a good ways ahead.  After that, well, we have to go through each content item (yikes!) and correct the "bad" markup produced by WYSIWYG editors.  This is, as you can imagine, less of a priority.  There always is a fight between users wanting the newest bestest version to be released yesterday, and users wanting to improve on what's already there, etc...

Come see us in the Standards, Usability & Accessibility forum, would love usable comments and discussions :) http://forum.joomla.org/index.php/board,142.0.html
Last edited by vavroom on Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

calorifer
Joomla! Apprentice
Joomla! Apprentice
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:19 am
Location: 127.0.0.1
Contact:

Re: joomla.org does not validate!!!

Post by calorifer » Sat Sep 10, 2005 6:05 pm

k, i just wanted to give you a heads up seeing that quite some time passed since the site is up and no changes had been done.
my signature is undergoin rebranding, stay put and wait for it

vavroom

Re: joomla.org does not validate!!!

Post by vavroom » Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:09 pm

And it will be some more time before it does.

Jaykul
Joomla! Apprentice
Joomla! Apprentice
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:00 pm

Re: joomla.org does not validate!!!

Post by Jaykul » Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:30 pm

:P It's getting worse instead of better. :-[

Can you at least fix the tag in demo.joomla.org which is supposed to be a tag?

I mean, it would be great if someone would also replace mosimage with a joomimage (or something that produces valid xhtml) so that you didn't have
s inside

s when you put an image in the page ... then at least the demo page would validate.


rvalerob
Joomla! Fledgling
Joomla! Fledgling
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 10:27 pm
Location: Castelldefels - SPAIN

Re: joomla.org does not validate!!!

Post by rvalerob » Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:55 pm

Hey, guys. There's no need to be so irritatingly insistent. I think everyone else understands the situation and being so reproachfully demanding is a bit uncomfortable for the rest of users (for me at least).

Let's give them a break.

All the best
ruben
Si el teflón es antiadherente, ¿cómo demonios lo pegan a las sartenes?

vavroom

Re: joomla.org does not validate!!!

Post by vavroom » Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:44 pm

Jaykul wrote:Can you at least fix the tag in demo.joomla.org which is supposed to be a tag?


Hmmm.  I don't see a problem with the tag on demo.joomla.org.  See for yourself (from the source of demo.joomla.org):

Code: Select all

<head>
<title>Joomla! Demo Site - Home</title>
<meta name="description" content="Joomla - the dynamic portal engine and content management system" />
<meta name="keywords" content="Joomla, joomla" />
<meta name="Generator" content="Joomla! - Copyright (C) 2005 Open Source Matters. All rights reserved." />
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
   <link rel="shortcut icon" href="http://demo.joomla.org/images/favicon.ico" />
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<link href="http://demo.joomla.org/templates/rhuk_solarflare_ii/css/template_css.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/>
</head>


Jaykul wrote:I mean, it would be great if someone would also replace mosimage with a joomimage (or something that produces valid xhtml) so that you didn't have
s inside

s when you put an image in the page ... then at least the demo page would validate.



The demo page (along with the entire joomla site, will validate when when joomla reaches the point of producing compliant output.  I refer you to our accessibility statement for a better idea of what is going on: http://help.joomla.org/content/view/805/125/

@ ruben, thank you for your support.

Jaykul
Joomla! Apprentice
Joomla! Apprentice
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:00 pm

Re: joomla.org does not validate!!!

Post by Jaykul » Wed Sep 28, 2005 11:04 pm

No breaks from me.  The rest of us have to do this work every time we do a website to please customers that want their sites to validate, so why shouldn't the Joomla :-* team hear it from their customers? :P

Anyway, you're right, the tag was just an artifact of the "madeyourweb" theme ... so, sorry to bother you with that, the demo site validates now, except when it has a {mosimage} on it.

User avatar
stingrey
Joomla! Engineer
Joomla! Engineer
Posts: 360
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: Marikina, Metro Manila, Philippines
Contact:

Re: joomla.org does not validate!!!

Post by stingrey » Thu Sep 29, 2005 1:36 am

Jaykul wrote:Can you at least fix the tag in demo.joomla.org which is supposed to be a tag?

A known bug in 1.0.1 that has been resolved in SVN and will be available in 1.0.2
Joomla! Core Team Member
Software Coding and Design - Stability Team Leader

God grant me the Serenity to Accept the things I cannot change, the Courage to change the things I can and the Wisdom to know the Difference.


Post Reply