On a side note I am kind of flattered that you care enough about me (for good or bad) to have found out and payed attention so quickly to me joining Mambo.
It's been less than two weeks after all.
For what it's worth I would like to make it very clear that I apologise for continuing to carry on when the answer had been provided.
My intention was not to troll or rubbish Joomla in this case regardless of what you might think.
My intention was solely to see that commercial GPL got the same deal as beer free GPL, which is in yes of course in my interests, but also in the community's to help them make an unbiased choice. Whether that bias be positive or negative.
As far as 'the GPL issue' is concerned, like you said I made my choice. I am moving on, and even though you think I was bringing it up again, I wasn't intending to. Perhaps both of us are still too sensitive to the issue for our own reasons so over reacted when there was no need.
Incidently what misinformation was I spreading here?
Access to this archive requires a subscription fee
Moderators: tydust, LorenzoG, timothy.stiffler
- Danayel
- Joomla! Apprentice
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:59 am
- Location: Nagoya, Japan
- Contact:
Re: Access to this archive requires a subscription fee
Ninjoomla - More than 45 Open Source web 2.0 Extensions
http://www.ninjoomla.com - Code so sharp, it kills.
http://www.ninjoomla.com - Code so sharp, it kills.
- infograf768
- Joomla! Engineer
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 3:47 pm
- Location: •Translation Matters•
Re: Access to this archive requires a subscription fee
"Incidentally" and "as the answer has already been provided" to the original post, this thread is now locked to prevent further OT posting.
Jean-Marie Simonet / infograf · http://www.info-graf.fr · GMT +1
Qui vult dare parva non debet magna rogare.
Qui vult dare parva non debet magna rogare.